W2RhdGEtdG9vbHNldC1ibG9ja3MtZmllbGRzLWFuZC10ZXh0PSJmNWNlOGM4OGFiOTUxNGIxZTJkMTgzMTYwOTZjN2Y5YyJdIHsgZm9udC1zaXplOiAxNHB4O2xpbmUtaGVpZ2h0OiAxLjJlbTsgfSBbZGF0YS10b29sc2V0LWJsb2Nrcy1maWVsZHMtYW5kLXRleHQ9ImY1Y2U4Yzg4YWI5NTE0YjFlMmQxODMxNjA5NmM3ZjljIl0gcCB7IGZvbnQtc2l6ZTogMTRweDtsaW5lLWhlaWdodDogMS4yZW07IH0g, The military in education & youth activities, Resources to use with political representatives, Anti-war activists battle to get their voices heard in WW1 centenary events, War crimes in video games should be punished, ICRC says, A Q&A document posted on the organisations website, Militarisation in everyday life in the UK: a conference report, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Has lost 85% of its territory in the 4th era. There is a big line between reality and the virtual world and for example, I cannot remember a video game shooter where I'm gunning civilians. Titles like Fable, Heavy Rain, Walking Dead and Dishonored all provide different paths for a player depending on their moral decisions during play and because the action is combined with a confirming narrative element, the meaning and weight of transgression can come through. Yeeeeah, I'm doomed if they manage to do anything with this. Press J to jump to the feed. In a BBC news report earlier this week, however, Francois Senechaud from the International Committee of the Red Cross told a reporter that, due to the increasing verisimilitude between first-person shooters and real-life combat, games should start to abide by the international laws of armed conflict. By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. Our intention is not to spoil player's enjoyment by for example, interrupting the game with pop-up messages listing legal provisions or lecturing gamers on the law of armed conflict. 1107 comment. Though that's touching on a political debate I'd probably best not fire up on a site like this. Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? We also have an Instagram page, where memes & templates are posted daily! Pages: 1 [2] Author Topic: Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? BBC has no right to stick their nose in bloody business that's theirs. But that's why the whole suggestion being made is the games follow the international war laws, Geneva Convention, things like that. I remember my first go on Taitos explosive arcade title Operation Wolf it was the late-80s and this frenzied blast-em-up, with its jungle environment and hostage rescue missions, was clearly gunning for a generation of Rambo II fanatics. 03/10/2013 Guardian Games Blog The Red Cross has told the BBC that it wants military-themed video games to adhere to real-life international laws Don't shoot the civilians. The best of TommyKay clips and funny moments in one place. By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. Is this feasible? That's all I'll say. It is these sorts of split-second decisions that really suggest something about the complexities of combat. Join us on Discord at https://discord.gg/TtR32WT. Though I actually play pretty nice. AllAmericanNegr0 8 oct 2021. By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. A well disciplined enemy! Meme Guy photo. Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? In games, moral depth is much more about humanisation than it is about punishment. Blockland Forums Home; Help; Login; Register; Blockland Forums . Cookie Notice Having more of these games with varied missions, rules/laws you have to abide by, etc. 12K Likes, 302 Comments. Advertisement. You must log in or register to reply here. Buddy, that's amature stuff compared to r/RimWorld. Many of. I don't think anyone would appreciate someone saying that about us based on a headline. IFunny Brazil is fun of your life. 6. No Votes: 18 94.7% Other Votes: . Should Gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? On the other hand, the ICRC feels players found "respecting the law of armed conflict" should be rewarded. Should actors be accountable for a murder in their movie? Create an account to follow your favorite communities and start taking part in conversations. But then if the consequences of illegal operations are subsumed into the gameplay mechanics i.e. We would like to see the law of armed conflict integrated into the games so that players have a realistic experience and deal first-hand with the dilemmas facing real combatants on real battlefields. ), Torture, holding hostages, suicide (assist), terrorism, illegal experiments, assaulting minors (technically not in mc but through it), and more i just cant remember how many life sentences is this worth? Memedroid: the best site to see, rate and share funny memes! Remember, no Russian. . ShOuLD GAmers bE aCcOunTaBle foR iN gAmE wAr cRiMeS | Let's Talk War Loch 393 subscribers Subscribe 194 Share 4.9K views 2 years ago Sorry about the gusts of breath, As most of you probs. Thanks for submitting to r/MemeTemplatesOfficial. The ICRC is suggesting that as in real life, these games should include virtual consequences for people's actions and decisions. Lol. 311 6. . Complete address if you would like to receive our posted newsletter. 1.5K 53. Battlefield 4 the siege of Shanghai level, GTA5 Online: microtransactions disabled as connection woes continue, Call of Duty Ghosts: hands-on and new details, A Q&A document posted on the organisation's website. One question though, is "Teabagging" a war crime? Which, when it comes to the moral implications of a game, is incredibly horrifying. ItsTickleTipson 5 feb 2022. Tx38b. Gamers should be rewarded for in game war crimes. Gamers should be rewarded for respecting the law of armed conflict and there should be virtual penalties for serious violations of the law of armed conflict, in other words war crimes. The sequence was brave, but also clumsily handled, exploitative and incongruous; however, it did place the player in a position where many felt they genuinely had to weigh up their moral proclivities with the demands of the gameplay mission. Should gamers be accountable in-game war crimes? No single, globally accepted treaty lists all war crimes. We would be keen to work with others, he said. 1.8K 106. What would be the fun in games if we couldn't massacre civillians? moments from the streamer TommyKay.TommyKay's Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/user/NuCasyTommyKay's Youtube2: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCpL9w-bCkuuOeuqunT-94BQTommyKay's Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/tommykayliveCHECK OUT OUR PLAYLISTS:The Funniest Clips Playlist: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi-Q9uhbxUxcdX8eJxyVifWLGyLGzRG4IEpic Gamer Moments Playlist: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi-Q9uhbxUxd9qgWfVTobEi8_7QDeVVCICursed Clips Playlist: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi-Q9uhbxUxekQL_sOtHFl0nDp0Lr-6LmHOI4/CK3/CK2 Clips Playlist: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi-Q9uhbxUxdqZb8VKWiXTUSCvEXLq9yBRoleplay Moments Playlist: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi-Q9uhbxUxeE2CYHZEsreQgRYSzTQzJaMusic Clips Playlist: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi-Q9uhbxUxeOyGgDRg8DGK-mNjr1_PvPEmotional Clips Playlist: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi-Q9uhbxUxeUfqVWJ1O8AYvmm13Hqbm8Boomer Moments Playlist: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi-Q9uhbxUxep20q7T0VAx8iQ4fWgRJGKThe Best Of TommyKay Playlist: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi-Q9uhbxUxc9nG2Uz2q8tIstFe55CJQl#Shorts #clips #TommyKay Not to say i'm anywhere close to up to date with current FPS games, those tend to be that last thing i pick up on my list of games to play, but I know from the last CoD game I played that friendly fire was instant game over, and the same applied for the very very very few civies that were in the game. This'. tl;dr all the posts, can't be assed to detail a response to this besides: Have fun watching your game sales tank (HAH?) AAA Hard Surface integrator for Characters, Concept artist and Asset artist responsible for: - military enemy characters. WWI and WWI would have been lost to evil, had we played by the rules of the Red Cross and UN. At least I don't play real world war games. That leaves games with what the ICRC describes as "more fictional" settings fantasy and sci-fi out of the equation, but means the proposed consequences would be seen in games such asBattlefield 4 orCall of Duty: Ghosts, were their developers to acquiesce to the Committee's requests. Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? I was just following orders. Without an -actual- crime, I don't see how anyone could be held accountable for war crimes in this manner. if you mean people hurting other people's feelings I say its too dam bad its a game suck it up . If courts were to punish you for virtual crimes, it should be their responsibility to say what you can and what you can't do in the game yet people are charged for crimes in the . Should gamers be accountable in-game war crimes? The problem with most Crime shows or series. I also think more realism is always good in games. April 22, 2020, 10:40:49 PM. I shot my team mate in the ass in Arma III and ran over all the civilians in the first grand theft auto. It doesn't matter how realistic a game ends up being, if people can't learn to separate reality from a simulation/video game then they don't have much business getting their hands upon them. How do you move beyond the simple message, "Mission failed, you have broken international law and will spend the next ten years in prison. And as said aboveif you're playing COD: Black Ops (or any game) on zombie mode, there are no laws. Anti-war activists battle to get their voices heard in WW1 centenary events War crimes in video games should be punished, ICRC says , The Red Cross has told the BBC that it wants military-themed video games to adhere to real-life international laws. Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. A place to post memes about Minecraft! Realism is good, yes, but to an extent. Let's start by taking back our Language! I don't think anything like this would ever go in, but I'd still be intrigued by a game that did have more than just "go pew pew pew everything" as part of the gameplay. In Operation Wolf, accidentally machine gunning a glitching sprite that vaguely resembled a non-military human could be easily divorced from the reality of armed conflict. In both Heavy Rain and Walking Dead, players face lethal moral decisions that don't end the game, or even have ludic consequences for the player, but yet play on the mind and colour the experience. We battle and slug it out and despite losing . Enjoy the meme 'Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes?' uploaded by Bolt93. . By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. Gamers should be rewarded for respecting the law of armed conflict and there should be virtual penalties for serious violations of the law of armed conflict, in other words war crimes. Just by the name alone people said it was a bully simulator. Quote: The International Red Cross has told the BBC that it wants military-themed video games to adhere to real-life international laws. Yes gamers should be held responsible. sheesh. This is something military games have been telling us for many years. The game may be over but the choices remain and by ending chapter of Waking Dead with a guide to the actions of other players, developer Telltale Games cleverly addresses and confronts the process. Seems like a reasonable suggestion to improve the quality of videogames, if you ask me, but I like fiction that deals with consequences of war with ambiguity and complexity. Great list, but it sounds like you need to play Plague Inc. Plague.Inc and People Playground players: My testificate genocide of 2018 is about to unleashed upon the brains of the public. [History] Keith Stuart / The Guardian - "Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes?" (2013) KotakuInAction Original. People must really be bored by the covid lock down. By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. I'm sorry guys. Hm, tempting. Boy they would hate what I did with my evil characters in skyrim and fallout 4. Ace Combat players: #should #gamers #accountable #game #war #ace #combat. coalition of 228 of the society's members this week urged a revision, 'Grand Theft Auto Online' off to a bumpy start, Video Games can help kids think and focus. So first off, this article is from October of 2013. wowall the other shit to improve upon in our society and the snowflakes choose this topic. Seems interesting to be aware of, although not applicable (or is it?) Also, zombie games are not included in this, in a zombie game if it twitches it dies! Originalton - TommyKay. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser. Crime and Punishment . As if the loss of 7 billion people due to genocide was just a footnote. If you look at the Guardian article, Red Cross is suggesting that videogames be more realistic and have in-game consequences for committing war crimes: And Red Cross says they don't want to ruin anyone's fun; they just want "realistic" war games to address the same political and social consequences of real wars. I dunno, it just frustrates me that people keep poking s**t when there is obviously nothing wrong with it. You know, I could continue to rant on this but I'm going to cut my reply short. It sounds to me more like some guy's personal vendetta against gamers. warp scramble them for 8 hours sometime, that's grief. I suggest folks read the article before going "OMG PC" or "OMG IDIOTS." . The amount of people I've killed in horrible, horrible ways in the Prototype series alone will have me locked away for a very long time. I don't think Prototype would count under "realistic war game", (PS, that's a cool raccoon drawing. Hangar 13. Besides, 'realism' in cases such as this would likely amount to pushing particularly political agendas. The ICRC is concerned that certain game scenarios could lead to a trivialization of serious violations of the law of armed conflict, they added. Its difficult to make out the difference between real footage and the footage you get from video games.. Article (with reader comments) from The Guardian. Same thing sorta happened with Bully. moments fr. You are using an out of date browser. Arma II's developer Bohemia Interactive is the first game-maker to pledge their support to the ICRC's initiative. And vitally, those who point their gun in the air before firing get the same dispersal effect without casualties. SquidRoss . October 7, 2013 in Off-Topic Discussion. It is also only suggesting this for games that represent realistic military situations. In a scene reminiscent of the Black Hawk Down incident, they must decide whether to shoot their way out or face death. Skyrim - Civil War Cyrodiil - No emperor. Ukraine, the U.S and its allies accuse Russian forces of targeting civilians indiscriminately, but Russia has consistently denied doing so. Signup Login. The ICRC is focusing strictly on games that "simulate real-war situations." 840 21. I can neither confirm nor deny the building of Auschwitz in minecraft. The ICRC is suggesting that as in real life, these games should include virtual consequences for people's actions and decisions. The best of TommyKay clips and funny moments in one place. Quit trying to run with 'video games teach kids violence', and blame bad parenting and lack of accountability in this day and age. Feedback. They can go ahead and give an opinion but at the end of the day, people like me couldn't GAF. So I say fine and have my guys ready to launch just in case. *snort* I would love to see them try to arrest and charge that many people smfh, its a fake world, full of fake people, me and the boys on our way to the execution chamber. I kill every civilian as a sith in Star Wars: The Old Republic. Persona Sie. #history #war #warmemes #ww2 #ww2history #stellaris #hoi4 #ww1 #ww2memes #hoi4memes". ? I mean why put your self out online if you have such a weak self image if what someone you may never meet or know could influence your feelings or make you day or even a minute of your day bad , why ? Although actually, it's more interesting than that, because the first shot fired sends the group fleeing something the player won't know until they commit to pulling the trigger. But what it wouldn't let you do was kill passing civilians: collateral damage of this sort took a big chunk off your health bar. Hammerfell - 2 factions are always in civil war with neither holding firm leadership Black Marsh - Is a disgusting swamp Even after the Tsaesci rulers there was still the Tribunal. Ad Bot. "We're not asking for censorship, we don't want to take any elements out of the games," he said. What would be the fun if this was ethical? 18 Sep 2022 00:17:51 . These days, if you accidentally (or otherwise) shoot a civilian or comrade in a military shooter, you'll probably get a 'mission failed' message and a one-way trip back to the last checkpoint. Every time someone blows up my car in GTA, I want the recovery cost irl. I imagine that while the Red Cross has their heart in the right place, most people find this idea to be absurd. It's still dumb. The way that mobile phone hacking lets us see into the personal problems of potential targets in Watch Dogs. Or is it only bad if someone mods it so that it takes place in the Middle East instead of NYC? Despite this statement, the ICRC claims it's "not involved in the debate about violence in video games." What the Red Cross wants to see then is the player being penalised for carrying out such actions as willfully killing civilians or torturing enemy combatants, both of which are punishable under international law. "Video games that represent contemporary battlefields are very close to reality," he said. Of course, this was really more about mechanics than ethics: players were being tested on their reactions and visual awareness, and failure meant a reduction in game time rather than a few moments' reflection on innocent victims. Gamers should be rewarded for respecting the law of armed conflict and there should be virtual penalties for serious violations of the law of armed conflict, in other words war crimes. We are at war with another corp. One of their members challenges me to a 1 on 1 and assures me the rest of their guys will abide by it. radicalislamgaming 3 feb 2022. If all transgressions automatically lead to failure, it's a zero-sum game that invites only functional thinking. Back to Home Gamer Memes. Avance de Crime Boss: RockayCity,Probamos el nuevo shooter cooperativo de Ingame Studios y 505 Games, con un reparto de lujo y algunas ideas bastante atractivas. The only way I could see games getting more realistic in this type of respect would be to add a sort of PoW feature instead of just busting in a room and killing all the bag guys without any option for them to surrender. These clips are all from funny, embarassing, awkward, fails, wins, cringey, memey, etc. Your anaconda definitely wants some. Keith Stuart: The Red Cross has told the BBC that it wants military-themed video games to adhere to real-life international laws, punishing player characters for war crimes. to FFXIV. Press J to jump to the feed. Brno, South Moravia, Czechia. 17 Sep 2022 19:30:26 . The current "shoot everything and don't get shot" extent of those games are /yaaaaaaaaawn. There's no reason in debating/arguing this, it just shouldn't be the issue. Killing civilians gets points deducted or what-have-you, while shooting the baddies progresses the game or gets you points. Currently, the American Psychological Association is reviewing its 2005 statement that said there "appears to be evidence" of this; a coalition of 228 of the society's members this week urged a revision, arguing that, based on the current research, some assertions in the statement "cannot be supported.". But what it wouldnt let you do was kill passing civilians: collateral damage of this sort took a big chunk off your health bar. Is teabagging a freshly made corpse a war crime? For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. By which I mean, Ive never committed a genocide. The ICRC is suggesting that as in real life, these games should include virtual consequences for people's actions and decisions. This topic makes me laugh. And if a person can not make the difference between reality and a game then they need help from a psychiatrist and as such would not be able to be held accountable for the "War crimes" they did in a game. By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. I would be right now biggest war crimer in world history. We are, though, surely heading into an era where gamers will have to take greater responsibility for their actions if only because the visual fidelity will be there to splatter our violent failings across the screen in HD detail. The, Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. Same. Ohh man. I read an article like this in a PC Gamer or Game Informer some months ago, but they seemed to be really focused on real-to-life war games, like Call of Duty and the like. Dont shoot the civilians. What you won't get is a military tribunal and a dishonorable discharge. Though now that i stop to think about it, is modern war anything other than it twitched shoot it? It wants developers to say, in this mission you must fly an armed drone over a school where terrorists are known to be hiding, and you must decide whether to open fire. Seems like a reasonable suggestion to improve the quality of videogames, if you ask me, but I like fiction that deals with consequences of war with ambiguity and complexity. There have been two stand-out examples. Rich_Boy_420 30 apr 2020. His claim may be valid: in 2011, British broadcaster ITVused footage from video gameArma II to illustrate purported paramilitary action. Last I checked, I'm out and about hunting bad guys whether they're the Covenant from the 'Halo' series or terrorists bad guys in 'Modern Warfare'. #should #gamers #accountable #game #war #persona #sie. I doubt fantasy games cross their vision. 431 39. If you look at the Guardian article, Red Cross is suggesting that videogames be more realistic and have in-game consequences for committing war crimes: The ICRC is suggesting that as in real life, these games should include virtual consequences for people's actions and decisions. 457 16. Warrior Nation: Anti-establishment ethos: critiquing the military and foreign policy, Warrior Nation: Very murky: the arms trade and Parliament, Warrior Nation podcast Gentleman Bureaucrat Masculinity: liberal militarism and the civil service, Warrior Nation podcast Lifting the Rock: the military and justice, Warrior Nation podcast Dirty Secrets: the press and the military, Warrior Nation podcast: Unpacking Armed Forces Day. Video games that represent contemporary battlefields are very close to reality, he said. I don't see where Red Cross is calling for gamers to be punished. War crimes in video games should be punished, ICRC says Oct. 3, 2013, 12:16 AM PDT By Henry Austin, NBC News contributor The International Committee of the Red Cross have called for video. I loved how when the GTA series first came into the public and right away people were saying it's nothing but a game where you kill cops all day. What the public fails to realize is that video games are big stress relievers for a lot of folk, myself included. In a BBC news report earlier this week, however, Francois Senechaud from the International Committee of the Red Cross told a reporter that, due to the increasing verisimilitude between first-person shooters and real-life combat, games should start to abide by the international laws of armed conflict. gamers are sub-human. Really!? In Modern Warfare 2's notorious No Russian mission a US soldier is embedded with a Russian terrorist organisation and must take part in a mass killing at an airport. In a BBC news report earlier this week, however, Francois Senechaud from the International Committee of the Red Cross told a reporter that, due to the increasing verisimilitude between first-person shooters and real-life combat, games should start to abide by the international laws of armed conflict. A Q&A document posted on the organisations website explains: The ICRC is suggesting that as in real life, these games should include virtual consequences for peoples actions and decisions. Butfrom a serious perspective this article refers to realistic conflict and it makes absolute sense that people, especially young impressionable people are made to realise that actions in the real world have consequences. People playground players. Furthermore, the ICRC statement makes clear that it is not interested in other genres it is concentrating on combat games that depict and concentrate on contemporary battlefields. The Open Society Foundations support international and Ukrainian organizations working to gather evidence of war crimes, aggression, and crimes against humanity committed during Russia's war against Ukraine and advocate for accountability, including: The 5 AM Coalition, a partnership uniting dozens of Ukrainian human rights organizations to . Let's be honest here - most of what is considered to be a 'war crime' these days tends to only be a 'war crime' when the enemy does it. Yes he is, whats going on? High Rock - Geographically cutoff from the rest of the empire. The ICRC is suggesting that as in real life, these games should include virtual consequences for people's actions and decisions. 12/2019 - 11/20212 roky. These days, if you accidentally (or otherwise) shoot a civilian or comrade in a military shooter, youll probably get a mission failed message and a one-way trip back to the last checkpoint. 2. For more information, please see our This brings in subject matter I am not comfortable to discuss on a forum. I don't think it's a bad idea from my completely subjective moral standpoint. People need thicker skin not just tissue paper for protection . And it probably helps explain just how . I don't see where Red Cross is calling for gamers to be punished. Gamers should be rewarded for respecting the law of armed. >_>. It adds immersion. Or you could just get a free pornhub premium account. :dazed: Funny, how I read it was someone from the Red Cross saying "I think realistic military simulators should include realistic military consequences for realistic military crimes.". The rules would just be a nice little piece of cheese for him to get us to follow into his traps. Something that I think more of the youth playing CoD need.