Ive turned off the automatic image review and hardly ever needto go through the menu - and for the few times that I do so I appreciate the very simple menu structure so its easy to find what Im after. if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-banner-1','ezslot_12',185,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-banner-1-0'); As it turned out, I would find more advantages with the Leica M262 when I got it. No more out of focus shots. You can post now and register later. Thanks!These new Nikons look fairly amazing I do wish theyd been quicker to market though!M10 review I guess it depends on how much it inspires a post out of me its the first new Leica Digital camera Ive ever bought, and with it being new/current, I might try and squeeze something out sooner rather than later. The Leica M-D Typ 262 was released in 2016 and is already rather difficult to find. The price is$5195/4050. Without a magnifier piececomfortable view is 50-35mm. I just dont shoot it at that high ISO for it to be a problem, and often wonder what on earth people are doing with their cameras to need the sorts of high ISOs that get spoken about it reviews. Let's try another side by side Leica Monochrom - 50 Lux - click for larger and crop - Leica M 240 - click for larger. Anyway, Im firmly off topic at this point, but almost two years on and I have no gripes at all with the M10. Although it may be possible to choose among other frame rates, those recordings usually have lower resolutions. Using it in this factory, a space where I needed to be aware of the timing of things that were happening around me, it just clicked for me. This is exiting news in so many ways that I will now test your patience for a few minutes in trying to explain it. To a degree, I can see their point too. Expanded ISO allows you to go beyond the native ISO. Live-view with any lens I liked was fun. My primary reasons for upgrading were: better high ISO capabilities ie. The consent submitted will only be used for data processing originating from this website. I shoot with 35mm and 50mm lenses. Agreed that the 262 is like some forgotten model.Also agreed on the fact that once the camera is set-up, theres no need for the buttons and menus. The M262 was the stripped-back camera that came after the M240 and before the M10 and as regular readers of this website will know, I do like a stripped-back camera.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[580,400],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_10',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); Leica must have listened to some of their users who felt that they didnt need a lot of the features that the Leica M240 offered them, and created a camera that felt a little more like a natural progression from the M9. Quick charge with automatic constant current control prevents battery from overcharging, short circuit, and electronic shock I too prefer the more stripped back feature set of the M9, M240, and M10. Don't be one of those people who blows their budget on a body and can barely afford to buy a lens or two. I can get focus on a defined distance or subject and with a remote release or the self timer, get stealthy images while at the same time getting real time information on exposure. At 0.68 magnification itll be hard to push to 75mm without a magnifier eyepiece x1.25 or x1.4. It is certainly one of the most economical full frame digital Leica M cameras out there, however, still a very expensive camera, even used. The M10 is also very slightly lighter than the M240. I shot film forever and my M2 was my first range finder. It was the third major iteration of colour digital Leica M rangefinder, and the first to use a CMOS type sensor. I was even contemplating selling my Leica lenses and the M3 as well, but I love using that film M system (and film photography) so much that I could not do it (at least not yet)! There are no 'Landscape', 'Sport', or 'Smile Detection' modes. Im not going to go into details here to be honest. Now, Im writing this after my M262 has come back from Germany (it only took a couple of months!! The upgrade to the M10 feels like its based on some fairly thin justifications, though I suspect (hope) that in practice just like swapping from M9 to M262 I will be pleasantly surprised by the fact that I find it brings more to the table than I expected. JPG Settings can be on the user assignable first screen and from that quickly turn on/off Monochrome. This thing has live-view, and video. Upload or insert images from URL. Leica has issued new, updated firmware for the entire range of Leica M10 and M240-generation cameras. I love the colors from the sensor as a whole, but one thing I dont like is rendering of skin tones. For me, theres no place for a comment like Peras. Forget is a strong word. Live-view brings something extra to a type of camera I had previously (possibly quite stubbornly) felt couldnt be improved. It does make me wonder if they could have slimmed down this body like the M10, were they to have released this camera as a major upgrade rather than a stripped-back sidestep from the M240. So, yeah, as I said, video is just not something I want to do with a Leica M camera! For the M240, forget it. It unites decades of experience in rangefinder technology with groundbreaking digital technologies: It features a completely newly developed high-resolution full-format CMOS sensor that, in combination with its high-performance processor and the legendary M-Lenses; delivers outstanding . The colour differences between the two are due to slightly different colour handling in the camera and can be cancelled out completely by the camera profiles in LR. Flip-out screens can be useful for tricky shots. . By A blessing in some ways, though frustratingly its taken the edge off a feature Ive enjoyed more than I expected to. It was mentioned in LFI first issue of 2016. The only shortcoming relating to the auto ISO function is that sometimes I feel like Id like to be able to see the ISO the camera is choosing on a shot by shot basis. Ive tried all of the digital M types and my heartfelt favorites are the M8 and M9-P (equally), then the Typ 262 in that order. A raw image file contains minimally processed data from the image sensor. I think it is a very cool and stripped down digital M camera that I purchased used to compliment my M3 (I use the M3 with a 50mm and 90mm lens). Image Quality. In fact, I could almost go as far to say that even this stripped back Leica has too many buttons and options for my needs! Its been that camera that I know is there and just crack out when it feels right. A personal taste thing of course, but youd think that a Leica camera would have a screen that was at least mostly accurate to the end photo? I didnt really need the better low light performance that the M262 offered, and was quite happy with the speed and output from the often lauded CCD sensor in the M9. At0.68 magnification itll be hard to push to 75mm without a magnifier eyepiece x1.25 or x1.4. By comparison, the Leica M240 had a lot of features many of which, as Ive alluded to, were seen by some as not needed on a Leica M rangefinder. In reality, Ive been saving for this m10 for a long time. However, the megapixel count is not the only important element determining the quality of an image. Great review as always, I look forward to the M10 review I think the slimmer body size alone is a reason to upgrade, feel like a proper M body. Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. A phase-detection autofocus system is faster than a contrast detection autofocus system. So its not a financial burden to have it around, and selling it wont yield me that much cash, and I have no desire to sell it anyways since its my favorite M of all time that still serves some legitimate purpose. On the M240 its easy to change ISO by simply pressing the dedicated ISO button and turning the thumb adjustment wheel.The EVF. Interesting article as I picked up a used m240 at Christmas at a good price. Given my choice to upgrade to the M10, possibly the most pertinent issue with the ISO settings is the inability to set or see the chosen ISO without pressing a button and looking at the back of the camera. Great article as always! Theres very little real difference between the two cameras so it really depends on what you can find to suit your budget - I certainly wouldnt hold out for one if you can find the other in decent condition. On the Leica M262 the thumb dial can be set to control exposure compensation. Didnt have the budget to stretch to a Summilux/Summicron/ Summarit. The beauty of the Leica M262 is what they took away.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[336,280],'35mmc_com-box-4','ezslot_16',182,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-4-0'); That being said, even with major Leica models the upgrade path involves such small incremental changes. Using the zoom focus button on the front of the camera along with Live View is a good aid to focus in these situations.Ergonomics. I upgrade cameras, selling them and adding a little bit of funds from what disposable income I do have, also relying on credit a bit too much. Never came to me idea to compare them side by side, sorry. You have to ask yourself, . The color profile is quite different too, with more electric blues and purer reds. I do think the 262 files have an edge over the 240. "MM-P""" Leica M Typ240MM-P Typ240 I use 3rd generation Sony A7 cameras with a cage and a big hand grip with a mic and an Atomos Ninja V external screen bolted to it. I like them nice and simple, low tech, etc. With AF tracking, once you choose the subject and press the shutter release part way down, as the subject moves, the autofocus will follow it. I also dont shoot flash and I dont bracket, so really the only part of the set-menu thats of use to me is the ISO settings, and the ISO settings have their own dedicated button. I have looked into all three cameras and all seem like perfectly great cameras . !if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-box-4','ezslot_13',182,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-4-0'); One way or another, in the time Ive been using the camera, Ive not got used to this little issue, though I have at least learned to live with it. In practice, this has translated into me being able to shoot it for a lot longer without having to think about changing or charging the battery. The M9 was a simple digital rangefinder with limited features and menu options, the M262 has even less in the menu and a slightly improved user interface. (Leica M (Typ 262)) CIPA is an independent, standard measurement that determines how many shots a camera can take before the battery dies. It was the third major iteration of colour digital Leica M . The type of viewfinder that the camera has. Is the 262 different in this regard? The Leica M [typ 240] (or M240 for short) was the first Leica to adopt the odd naming convention that broke away from the M# convention of yore. M9 is magic, even SOOC jpgs. Its. If you intend to use lenses wider than 28mm or longer than 135mm Liveview and EVF are very useful, also macro photography is much easier (essential with the new 90mm macro lens and macro adapter) or if you need video. The Leica M [typ 240] (or M240 for short) was the first Leica to adopt the odd naming convention that broke away from the M# convention of yore. I didnt discover this, despite that being how the M9 works. We were using the Sony cameras for video, so as I often do, I was shooting stills with the Leica. Sadly, that is the way of digital cameras my friend, a never-ending hamster wheel of upgrades. I am sure you have seen the funny Video of Kai Wong:https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Wong+Laica+M+262, I have indeed, thanks, I shall take another look its been a while!Sounds like youve made a good choice!I have recently picked up a TL to use along side the forthcoming M10 they both use the same Visoflex, Im going to take the charitable route here but Pera Detlics comment may be interpreted as Leicas are expensive and Pera doesnt have the matching skill set to justify buying one.I also feel that way. To each his own, indeed!Ive never seen one in real life mad to think Ive ordered a camera of that value without handling it. Source: DxOMark. Unfortunately, my business partner has also vetoed the idea of me selling both M240 and M262 to buy an M10. . Battery power, or battery capacity, represents the amount of electrical energy that a battery can store. Otherwise, the two cameras are similar since the 262 is really just a pared-down version of the 240 and if its mainly the rangefinder experience that you are after then you cant go wrong with either. BECOME A MEMBER to get access to perks:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMbqwh98qO5wWowtQjIK8ig/joinEXCLUSIVE PRESETS FOR IMAGES CAPTURED WITH LEICA CAMERAS:. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. With a higher light sensitivity (ISO level), the sensor absorbs more light. Fortunately, whilst the control of ISO isnt quite perfect, I have found the way exposure compensation works on the Leica M262 to be a big step up from the M9. This might sound like a small criticism, and Im sure many wouldnt even notice or care, but actually it goes back to what I was saying earlier about familiarity. Leica has used the button space on the rear of the camera that is used for live view in the Typ 240 to add direct access to the white balance feature. The M240 is a camera where perhaps 50% of the image is created in camera, 50% in computer. And the EVF is a very helpful feature sometime. I got the m262 because it has everything i need and nothing i do not need. I decided that I wanted to keep the one camera that can do close to everything I need in the digital world (and for me, this includes personal and occasional professional work, mostly product still photography, but also videography). Leica M Typ 240. Thanks for posting, enjoyed the images. One of the advantages of live-view is the same as one of the advantages of rangefinder cameras they both allow you to observe the world outside of the frame. The LEICA M typ 240 offers a much quieter shutter than the M9, as well as LEICA's first option for an external electronic viewfinder (EVF), the . I love the M240, didn't feel to switch to the M10. TheLeica M (Typ 262) has a pared-down feature set, an extra quiet shutter unit and a lower price than theM Typ 240. Mostly because I wanted to shoot below 0.7m and Id have to use Live View for that. Congratulations on your decision. With ACR, my standard daylight setting for the M240 is 5300/10, while with the M262, it is 5000/0, both with embedded profile. The ideas with Leica is identities. In the setup menu, the most used setting is white balance. The M240 is a great camera that produces gorgeous images but you are undoubtedly going to love the M10. . Possibly Leica got the Bayer filter from a different supplier making the change needed. I have not seen that anywhere in the promotional material. I keep looking at the 262 as a hidden gem. Fortunately, when the image popped up in Lightroom, it was fine or at least it was little different to a photo that I might have expected out of the M262. Theres been a couple of times when Ive picked the camera up one after using it in lower light and ended up shooting a whole loads of frames at a high ISO before twigging that the chosen shutter speed seems too high. The camera becomes entirely unresponsive. One has a brightline window, the other does not. . - Leica M 262 & Voigtlnder 50/1.2. The settings I use (format and manual or auto lens designation) pop up first on the main menu and with 2 clicks both actions are completed. I would say a hidden gem at 2/3 of the price for a used M-10. Then I bought an early mirrorless camera possibly a Panasonic or Sony, I cant remember which came first and I had to eat a load of humble pie. I cant even work out how to hold the Leica M240 for video, and whilst it has focus peaking, it certainly doesnt have the features the Atomos brings to the table. Functionalism be damned. The Leica M9/ M8 B&W JPEGs can be created 95-99% in camera and I would say my black and white film images are 88% in camera/film developing, 2% scanning, 10% in computer to remove dust and do any basic darkroom style adjustments. With 100% coverage, you can compose the image correctly when you capture the photo. Now, I should just say at this point that when I first got my Leica M262 I found the exact opposite. Of course they can, but you have them. 3200-10,000 (I find this to be really handy for indoor family photos, which is essentially the only time I need high ISOs) the larger and brighter viewfinder the size (yes, one can really feel a difference) overall operational responsiveness to a much lesser degree: fewer buttons on the back of the camera, smaller red dot, more matte black finish. Thorsten Overgaard recently posted two comparative X-Rite colorchecker images that show the colour differences between the 262 and 240 which sold me on the 262. I'm looking into both as well and leaning towards the 262 because I have no use for video with this purchase and I love the shutter. That alone justifies the decision to buy. In this buying guide weve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing around $2000 and recommended the best. Source: DxOMark. Of course Im now retired and not doing imaging for a living. I drive a 15 year old car for example, dont buy clothes often, have one pair of shoes, etc. And if you find the viewfinder better, as many report. With less than full coverage, you may have to crop your photos afterward to get them looking perfect. I currently have a q which is a lot of fun but I'm more interested in a rangefinder at this point. I dont have and 6-bit coded lenses, or really bother with the coding, so just tend to set the minimum speed to 1/60th. This means the image will be stabilised regardless of what lens is being used. Im not loaded, but I do focus almost all my disposable income on this. The thing is, I much prefer the warm display on the M262. When the Leica M262 was released, Leica proudly told the world that the menu had been reduced to two screens worth of features. I am seeing a few posts by M262 / M-D owners stating that there is slightly improved image quality and even less banding at higher ISOs on the M262 series cameras. Here is a quickreview and comparison for the Leica M Typ 262 vs M Typ 240 rangefinder cameras. Bringing up the live-view display gave me what appeared to my taste to be a quite unpleasant representation of the world in front of the camera. The camera is nearly forgotten in the Leica world. I am very pleased to be in a forum withso many helpful people. In short, getting two cameras- a classic and a modern type, solves the damnable inadequacy issue that arises in all of us when you own just one type. I use it for mostly personal/travel type shooting, with the occasional casual paid shoot. 1) Slimmer - The M10 has a slimmer camera body than the M240, similar to the Leica film cameras such as a Leica M6. I currently own a 262. All photographs and text appearing on 35mmc.com are the exclusive property of the named author (except where stated otherwise) and are protected by copyright. Your previous content has been restored. The M240 feels, well, fuller. The better the dynamic range the system captures a wider number of values from dark to light leading to more details in low and highlights. I could get myself in position where something was about to happen, use the rangefinder or live-view to pick a point of focus, then whilst looking at the back of the camera I could use my peripheral vision to judge the timing of whatever I was taking a photo of whilst maintaining focus confirmation.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[250,250],'35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2','ezslot_17',184,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2-0'); I do this all the time with the Sony cameras, yet had never joined the dots and worked out that it might be something Id enjoy or find use for with a rangefinder. But even this hasnt really bothered me too much it might be a little clumsy what with the need to press 3 buttons when you want to change ISO, but the way the auto ISO works pretty much makes up for it. If not, get the 262. A higher megapixel count means that the camera is capable of capturing more details. It does take lovely photos however and I dont mind using I most of the time but. The build quality of the M 262 is impeccable. Here are photos from my first shoot with it: https://matthewtrader.com/leica-m262-review-after-photographing-my-nieces-5th-birthday-party. It's slightly lighter than the 240 and I have no use for video nor live view in a Leica. I took the M240 because it offeres live view. Im still getting used to it, but for me a 2 issues, weight with a big 50mm lens and editing the files you really bring out the image quality as it seems a bit flat to me. Leica has used the button space on the rear of the camera that is used for live view in the Typ 240 to . Be the first. Since receiving a closer focusing lens though Ive noticed that actually the M10 rangefinder goes down to about 0.58m and the M262 goes to about 0.65m. Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. If you intend to use lenses wider than 28mm or longer than 135mm Liveview and EVF are very useful, also macro photography is much easier (essential with the new 90mm macro lens and macro adapter) or if you need video. We were perfectly happy in the film days when KODAK or FUJI(film) updated our sensor with a new emulsion. It is capable of shooting stills in a lossless compressed raw format. Every other brand talks about new improved this, and added or increased that. document.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value",(new Date()).getTime()); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Oddly though, handling the Leica M262 there is the slightest sense that somethings missing when comparing it to its fuller-featured sibling, the M240. That said, M10 GAS is real. It has two memory card slots, allowing you to store more photos without switching cards.